This has been done by interviewing hundreds of people
in the
streets, educated people at schools, universities
and several
associations, farmers in the fields, workers
in the factories, employees
in the companies, learners
at schools, women, young and elders
everywhere.
We have
tried to talk to representatives of different
layers of the
organizations to make our research
more diversificated and complete.
These semi-
structured interviews resulted in qualitative data,
which had
been processed and analyzed using
coding technique.
Our research used 2 methods:
One of academic character, and one
of practical
character.
1-The academic purpose is in investigating
relationship
between Education and Development.
2-The practical purpose is in giving analysis-based
recommendations about possible ways to implement
education to solve our global and cultural problems.
3-We used team work, pair work, individual work,
interviews, lectures, debates, experiencing,
observations, analysis, synthesis, assessment,
feedback and evaluation.
4-We
held workshops, modeling, training units authentic
field practice in
actual fields and we assessed, followed
and evaluated what we
recommended academically
before.
Outcomes and impact –
My
PhD research mustn't be put on a library shelf to be stored like the
ones that couldn't be benefited from. My PhD a practical and relevant
research. It is a message of progress, development, promotion and the
only solution for the problems that people in charge of education ,
planners, administrators, teachers, learners, course content authors and
people of assessment all over the world.
1-My research is Significant :
My proposed research will be academically
significant. To do this properly, I acknowledge relevant
existing scholarship and I explain how my research will relate to it. I am able to
show how my PhD will contribute to its field and – ideally – indicate
some of the gaps in knowledge it will aim to fill.
2-My research is feasible / doable:
1-Each
education association must know that the education
policy is
based on using critical thinking skills not just attainment or learning
by heart.
2-
Many training units, workshops, conferences and webinars must be held
3-My PhD is worthwhile.:
My research deals with a very vital and important problem that causes worry to all people all over the world. It is actual. It touches our lives everywhere. If we solve the problems of education, all programs of sustainable development will succeed.
4-I suggest what will become
possible.
1-Other researchers can use
or build upon my research results. My research
will close the gaps of the missing relation between the education
policy,curriculum and assessment in academic knowledge.
2-
I am ready to do workshops, webinars,conferences, training units and
meetings to do professional development visits and meetings for the
teachers in my country with attendance or through using technology.
3-
I can use my global education sites and my blog to do professional
development meetings to all teachers all over the world with attendance
or through using my sites, emails or the university platform..
4-
If the people in charge put me in charge of implementing my project in
my country, I will enter classes with the company of teachers and senior
teachers of English and do model lessons based on using critical
thinking skills.
5-
If I was asked to do professional development anywhere all over the
world, I am ready to do the same to add my knowledge to humanity.
6- I am ready to be in touch with any university or any education association all over the world to give a hand .
7- My project is worthy and doable. It doesn't cost much money or funding. It is easy not difficult. It is very possible.
5-Originality/value
This study depicted a daily life practical Lesson Study activity through solving problem method. the lesson was: ( Environmental Pollution Problem) which focused on the students’ critical thinking
activity through the integration of PBL and learners' work groups in their authentic and practical daily life situations.
5-Discussion
The purpose of the discussion is to interpret and
describe the
significance of our findings in light of what
was already known about
the research
problem being
investigated and to explain any new understanding or
insights that emerged as a result of our study of the problem.
DISCUSSION provides the explanation and
interpretation of results or
findings by comparing
with the findings in prior studies.
Then, I can
say that: compared to the previous study
about (Homogeneous VS heterogeneous), I say that
my research is different .
My research recommended the following:
Advanced students at times feel they are forced
into a leadership role they do not want when they
are part of a
heterogeneous group. Rather than being
able to learn the new concepts at
their own speed,
they are expected to assist other students or are
held
to learning at the rate of the whole class.
Students of lesser
abilities may fall behind in a
heterogeneous group and end up stigmatized
for s
lowing the rate of the whole class or group. In a
study group or
work group, they may end up shunted
aside or ignored rather than
assisted.
A teacher needs to identify when the heterogeneous
grouping isn't working for any level of student. They need
to support
the advanced students by supplying additional
challenges and ensure the
students who are falling
behind are given the assistance they need to
catch up.
There is a risk for the students in the middle as well,
who
may not get the individual attention they need due
to the teacher's
concentration on the students at either
end of the spectrum.
6-Limitations
“The empirical results reported herein should be
considered in the light of some limitations.”
1-Time constraints
Just as researchers have deadlines to turn in
their
class papers, academic researchers also must meet
the deadline
for submitting a research manuscript to
a journal. Therefore, the time
available to study a
research problem and to measure change over
time is
constrained by the deadline of my “assignment.”
I should have Made sure I choose a
research problem
that I will be able to complete well before the
assignment’s deadline. If time constraints negatively
impacted my
study in any way, acknowledge this
impact by mentioning a need for a
future study
(e.g., a longitudinal study) to answer this research
problem.
2-Conflicts arising from cultural bias and other
personal issues
Researchers might be biased views due to
their
cultural backgrounds or perspectives of certain
phenomena, and
this can affect a study’s legitimacy.
Also, it is possible that
researchers will have biases
toward data and results that only support
their
hypotheses or arguments.
In order to avoid these problems, the
author(s) of a
study should examine whether the way the problem
was
stated and the data-gathering process were
carried out appropriately. I found a difficulty ,
but I did it .
3-More study:
I suggest additional studies in the future as the
subject of my
research is of a national importance
to my great country. Leading a
multicultural team
is very important.
7-Conclusion
In conclusion, I provide a
brief conclusion that ties
each of the findings together and provides a
narrative
bridge to the discussion section of the your paper.
We
reached to the objectives we set before and the
vision we dreamed of
through implementing our mission,
goals and objectives. Through
conclusion, I give my
recommendations.
All people at any organization should know and
practice their work
according to the organization
principles, values, vision, mission, goals
and
objectives. All people became loyal to their
organization in terms
of communication,
responsibility, tolerance, understanding, good
relation,
teamwork, love, respect, the ideal atmosphere that
paved the
way to creation and innovation.
Also, the leaders worked in terms of
communication,
sharing, mercy, rewards, listening to complaints and