managers and
20 educational leaders or administers
beside 50 teachers and senior
teachers working at
schools and education zones and supervision.
These semi-structured interviews resulted in
qualitative data, which had
been processed and
analyzed using coding technique.
Our research used 2 methods:
One of academic character, and one
of
practical character.
1-The academic purpose is in investigating
relationship between organizational structure,
leadership, and
communication and organizational
performance, i.e. efficiency and
productivity.
2-The practical purpose is in giving analysis-based
recommendations about possible ways to increase
productivity and
efficiency to our educational
organizations.
3-We used interviews, lectures, debates, experiencing,
observations, analysis, synthesis, assessment,
feedback and evaluation.
4-We
held workshops, modeling, training units
authentic field practice in
actual fields and we
assessed, followed and evaluated what we
recommended academically before.
It took 3 months to conduct our
experiences that
we acquired from our professors in East Anglia
University, England.
Outcomes and impact –
My
PhD research mustn't be put on a library shelf to be stored like the
ones that couldn't be benefited from. My PhD a practical and relevant
research. It is a message of progress, development, promotion and the
only solution for the problems that people in charge of education ,
planners, administrators, teachers, learners, course content authors and
people of assessment all over the world.
1-My research is Significant :
My proposed research will be academically
significant. To do this properly, I acknowledge relevant
existing scholarship and I explain how my research will relate to it. I am able to
show how my PhD will contribute to its field and – ideally – indicate
some of the gaps in knowledge it will aim to fill.
2-My research is feasible / doable:
1-Each
education association must know that the education
policy is
based on using critical thinking skills not just attainment or learning
by heart.
2-
Many training units, workshops, conferences and webinars must be held
3-My PhD is worthwhile.:
My research deals with a very vital and important problem that causes
worry to all people all over the world. It is actual. It touches our
lives everywhere. If we solve the problems of education, all programs of
sustainable development will succeed.
4-I suggest what will become
possible.
1-Other researchers can use
or build upon my research results. My research
will close the gaps of the missing relation between the education
policy,curriculum and assessment in academic knowledge.
2-
I am ready to do workshops, webinars,conferences, training units and
meetings to do professional development visits and meetings for the
teachers in my country with attendance or through using technology.
3-
I can use my global education sites and my blog to do professional
development meetings to all teachers all over the world with attendance
or through using my sites, emails or the university platform..
4-
If the people in charge put me in charge of implementing my project in
my country, I will enter classes with the company of teachers and senior
teachers of English and do model lessons based on using critical
thinking skills.
5-
If I was asked to do professional development anywhere all over the
world, I am ready to do the same to add my knowledge to humanity.
6- I am ready to be in touch with any university or any education association all over the world to give a hand .
7- My project is worthy and doable. It doesn't cost much money or funding. It is easy not difficult. It is very possible.
5-Discussion
The purpose of the discussion is to interpret and describe the
significance of our findings in light of what was already
known about the research
problem being investigated
and to explain any new understanding or
insights that
emerged as a result of our study of the problem.
DISCUSSION provides the explanation and interpretation of
results or
findings by comparing with the findings in prior
studies.
Then, I can
say that: compared to the previous study about
(Intercultural Communication), I say that my research is
different .
My research recommended the following:
Assessment
Courses on the theory and content of intercultural
communication tend
to evaluate knowledge by
means of written examination and essay.
Alternatively projects may involve students applying
their theoretical
knowledge to particular communicative
situations or conducting
small‐scale ethnographic or
case study research from home.
Evaluation of intercultural communication as practice
may occur in the
assessment of general language
courses (e.g. translation), but since
intercultural
communication is not systematically taught as part
of
general language courses, formalized assessment
is not widespread. In
some institutions, however,
the practice of writing logbooks is
established, and
intercultural awareness is assessed through reflective
essays.
Any such assessment is likely to be integrated with
other
factors associated with advanced language learning.
There is little sign
of role‐play or self‐assessment
being widely practiced, though, in
exceptional cases,
it can be effectively integrated into oral
assessment,
e.g. through situation‐based interpreting.
Given that
intercultural competence can be separated
into knowledge, skills and
attitudes, only the knowledge
component can, strictly speaking, be
assessed in
traditional ways.
Skills and attitudes need to be assessed
in other ways
such as role‐play, observation, self‐assessment or
reflection on critical incidents. Yet such assessment
practices are not
widespread within European higher
education language programs.
6-Limitations
“The empirical results reported herein should be
considered in the light of some limitations.”
1-Time constraints
Just as researchers have deadlines to turn in
their
class papers, academic researchers also must
meet the deadline
for submitting a research
manuscript to a journal. Therefore, the time
available to study a research problem and to
measure change over time is
constrained by
the deadline of my “assignment.”
I should have Made sure I choose a
research problem that
I will be able to complete well before the
assignment’s
deadline. If time constraints negatively impacted my
study
in any way, acknowledge this impact by mentioning a
need for a
future study (e.g., a longitudinal study) to
answer this research
problem.
2-Conflicts arising from
cultural bias and other
personal issues
Researchers might be biased views due to
their cultural
backgrounds or perspectives of certain phenomena,
and
this can affect a study’s legitimacy. Also, it is possible
that
researchers will have biases toward data and results
that only support
their hypotheses or arguments. In order
to avoid these problems, the
author(s) of a study should
examine whether the way the problem was
stated and
the data-gathering process were carried out appropriately.
I found a difficulty , but I did it .
3-More study:
I suggest additional studies in the future as the subject
of my research is of a national importance to my great
country.
Leading a multicultural team is very important.
7-Conclusion
In conclusion, I provide a
brief conclusion that ties each
of the findings together and provides a
narrative bridge
to the discussion section of the your paper. We
reached
to the objectives we set before and the vision we dreamed
of
through implementing our mission, goals and objectives.
Through
conclusion, I give my recommendations.
We reached to the objectives we set before and the vision
we dreamed of
through implementing our mission, goals and
objectives. All people at
any organization knew and practiced
their work according to the
organization principles, values,
vision, mission, goals and objectives.
All people became loyal
to their organization in terms of communication,
responsibility,
tolerance, understanding, good relation, teamwork,
love,
respect, the ideal atmosphere that paved the way to creation
and innovation.
Also, the leaders worked in terms of communication,
sharing,
mercy, rewards, listening to complaints and